Chemokines and Stealth Viruses: A Blueprint for Therapy in Infected Humans and Animals (Part I)


Relatively small proteins (peptides) that mediate intercellular signaling among lymphocytes responding to antigenic challenge, were originally referred to as lymphokines. This term was replaced by interleukins, since lymphokine did not fully reflect intercellular communications between lymphocytes and cells of macrophage/monocyte lineage. It was further realized that related, and sometimes even identical peptides, were being produced by and exerted growth regulatory effects on cells outside of the immune system. The more inclusive term cytokine was, therefore, applied for locally acting peptide molecules that provided intercellular signaling for multiple cellular systems. Several cytokines were named for the cellular modulating property with which they were initially associated. For example, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) was shown to cause death of certain tumor cells; melanoma growth stimulatory activity (MGSA) was named for its ability to stimulate melanoma cells, etc. Other cytokines were defined by their cellular location, for example nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB).

A subset of cytokines was found to have an additional property of mobilizing and attracting cells towards their source. These chemo attractant cytokines were termed chemokines. An interesting structural correlation has emerged regarding the presence of cystine disulphide bonds within chemokine molecules, and the types of immune cells bearing receptors able to receive the migratory signal from the chemokine. Specifically, the beta class of chemokine, which primarily attracts monocytes, possesses two adjacent cysteine amino acids within the left side of the molecule. These cysteines interconnect with two distally placed cysteines to form two disulphide cystine to cystine bonds. Beta chemokines are designated CC because of the adjacent positioning of the pair of cysteine amino acids. Alpha chemokines, which primarily attract neutrophils, and to some extent lymphocytes, have a single amino acid separating the pair of cysteines, and are designated CXC chemokines. MGSA is an example of a CXC chemokine, as is interleukin-8. Fractalkines are primarily involved in neuron-glial cell interactions, but can also influence immune function. They have three amino acids separating the cysteine pair, and are designated CX3C. Lymphotaxins are a fourth class of chemokines with a single disulphide bond and are designated C. Multiple representatives of CC and CXC chemokines have been described, in comparison with only a few examples of CX3C and C chemokines.

A corresponding diverse array of chemokine receptors has been identified. Some are highly specific for limited members within a chemokine class, while others can allow binding of multiple chemokines, even belonging to different classes. The CC, CXC and CX3C receptors are designated numerically in the order that they were identified, for example CXCR4 was the fourth type of receptor identified that preferentially binds a CXC chemokine. The receptors are cell surface proteins with seven segments that traverse the cell membrane and an intracytoplasmic tail that interconnects with a signal transducing group of proteins known as G proteins. Receptor binding can lead to a series of changes within the cell, many of which are mediated by the transfer of a phosphate residue from cyclic guanosine triphosphate (GTP).

Viruses and Chemokine Receptors

Scientific interest in chemokine receptors was boosted with the realization that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) isolates could utilize the CXCR4 and /or CCR5 chemokine receptors in order to gain entry into lymphocytes. Indeed individuals inheriting certain genetic forms of these receptors were far less prone to HIV infection than was the general population. Moreover, in lymphocyte cultures, occupancy of the receptors with their corresponding chemokine, could inhibit viral infection. Chemokine receptors are used by several other viruses, many of which also code for chemokines and/or chemokine receptors. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) contains a gene that codes a potent CC chemokine receptor. The gene is designated US28 since it is the 28th gene along a unique short segment of the HCMV genome. The other segment is called the unique long (UL) segment and codes up to 154 genes. The US28 gene of HCMV can provide intracellular access for HIV and can also act as a trap to diminish the probability that CC chemokines would be blocking the cellular receptors on other T lymphocytes. CC chemokine receptors are also coded by other herpes viruses, including human herpesvirus-6 and human herpesvirus-8. HCMV and mouse cytomegalovirus also code for CXC chemokines and can induce cellular chemokine production from infected cells. The tissue culture infectivity of HCMV is enhanced in the presence of interleukin-8, a CXC chemokine.

Stealth Adapted Viruses

In a process termed stealth adaptation, viruses can avoid elimination by cellular immunity, if they lack genes coding the relatively few structural components that are targeted by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). An atypical African green monkey simian cytomegalovirus (SCMV) was isolated from a patient with the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). It caused no inflammatory reaction within the patient, nor when inoculated into cats. The cats did, however, develop widespread signs of cellular damage including the development of foamy, vacuolated cells throughout the brain. Similar changes were readily induced in cultures of human and animal cells. Since isolating this virus, evidence for stealth virus infection has been found in numerous patients with a wide spectrum of neuropsychiatric and immunological diseases. The diagnoses applied to stealth virus infected patients have varied depending upon the major clinical manifestations, and in part, upon the clinical background and perspective of the diagnosing clinician. The illnesses have included autism, behavioral and learning problems in children; depression, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, Gulf war syndrome, multiple sclerosis and severe psychosis in adults; and degenerative neurological diseases, including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, in the elderly. The viruses found in various patients with these diseases were termed stealth because of their apparent inability to evoke an inflammatory response and partly because they had gone undetected by earlier investigators seeking an infectious cause for such illnesses.

DNA sequencing studies on the prototype stealth virus confirmed the deletion of the gene coding the dominant antigen (UL83) recognized by anti-cytomegalovirus CTL. Deletions and major disruptions were also present in several of the other genes known to code significant antigens normally targeted by anti-cytomegalovirus CTL. The question arose as to how such a virus could retain and/or regain its ability to damage cells. A series of experiments showed that the virus had a fragmented, genetically unstable genome. Moreover, it had assimilated various additional genes both from infected cells and also from various bacteria. More recent studies have implicated chemokines and chemokine receptors in the biology of this stealth adapted virus.

Melanoma Growth Stimulatory Activity (MGSA) Chemokine Coding Genes

Sequencing of cloned fragments obtained by restriction enzyme cutting of the SCMV-derived prototype stealth virus has revealed complex patterns of viral, cellular and bacterial sequences. One region of the virus shows a linear alignment of the following genes UL141, UL144, UL145, an undefined region of probable cellular origin and three genes most closely related, in terms of protein coding, to the cellular alpha chemokine gene, MGSA. The stealth viral genes differ somewhat from each other but have all retained the defining CXC arrangement of the cysteine amino acids. The genes were assimilated from an RNA molecule since they generally lack the non-coding intron components that are the parts of cellular DNA that are excluded from cytoplasmic RNA. This finding indicates that stealth virus replication has involved reverse transcription, presumably by a cellular homologue of a retrovirus. While MGSA is now regarded as a prominent alpha-chemokine, it is also considered a potential cancer-causing gene (oncogene). The finding of this gene has raised the prospect that stealth adapted viruses may carry other oncogenes and be responsible for the significant increases in various types of cancers. Indeed, in early studies many cancer patients are testing positive for stealth viruses, in contrast to healthy blood donor. The prospect of oncogenic stealth-adapted viruses evolving from replicating viruses through the assimilation of an oncogene provides an imperative to hasten the development of at least suppressive, anti-stealth virus therapies.

Chemokine-Receptor Coding Genes

Continued sequencing of the prototype stealth adapted virus identified another segment in which the following genes were present: US24, shortened US26 and five genes related to US28 chemokine receptors. The five genes have diverged somewhat from each other yet have retained critical amino acids in common with the US28 gene of HCMV and the CX3CR receptor which is the human cellular gene that most closely matches the stealth virus genes. The next best matching set of cellular genes was CC receptors, with one of the five genes also showing a good match to a CXC receptor.

Based on the demonstration that the prototype stealth adapted virus carried expanded copies of both chemokine and chemokine receptor coding genes, it seemed likely that, at least this virus, was been driven and/or was exerting some of its pathological effects through chemokine mediated pathways of cellular activation.

Chemokines and Their Receptors as Targets for Therapy

The initial association of chemokines as mediators of immune responses stimulated the identification of drugs that could affect chemokine mediated pathways of lymphocyte activation. Immune enhancement was a major goal of potential cancer therapies, while immunesuppression was desired for patients with autoimmune diseases and for transplant recipients. This endeavor expanded considerably with the realization that chemokine receptors were involved in HIV infection. These developments are particularly timely in view of the data obtained on the prototype stealth virus.

During the last several years, useful information has been obtained regarding various therapies that appear to have offered benefit to stealth virus infected patients. Cultures have been noted to have gone from rapid strong positive to delayed weak positive after the institution of various empirical therapies. Several of these approaches have involved what is generally regarded as alternative medicine. It is striking that many of these therapies have been linked to possible inhibition of cytokine/chemokine production and activity. Up to the present, however, there has been little guidance on which of the many treatment options available should be pursued and how, apart from the subjective feeling of wellness, to regulate dosage. While individual chemokines can be measured, there is insufficient data to relate these levels to stealth viral load. The availability of a semi-quantitative assay of stealth virus infection provides a more direct laboratory reflection on treatment efficacy.

Continued in Part II

© Copyright 2002 by W. John Martin, M.D., Ph.D., USA

Share this...
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on TumblrEmail this to someone


One Response to “Chemokines and Stealth Viruses: A Blueprint for Therapy in Infected Humans and Animals (Part I)”

  1. Chemokines and Stealth Viruses:A Blueprint for Therapy in Infected Humans and Animals (Part II) | Healing Base on December 9th, 2011 14:03

    […] Chemokines and Stealth Viruses:A Blueprint for Therapy in Infected Humans and Animals (Part II) var addthis_product = 'wpp-262'; var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true,"data_track_addressbar":false};if (typeof(addthis_share) == "undefined"){ addthis_share = [];}Continued from Part I […]

Share your thoughts...

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>